From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea7ac816f5c3d0a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-25 18:21:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: adam@irvine.com (Adam Beneschan) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Wide_Text_IO: bad data in text file Date: 25 Oct 2002 18:21:27 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1035595287 19638 127.0.0.1 (26 Oct 2002 01:21:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Oct 2002 01:21:27 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30145 Date: 2002-10-26T01:21:27+00:00 List-Id: "Frank J. Lhota" wrote in message news:... > "Adam Beneschan" wrote in message > news:b4682ab7.0210250722.41ac473a@posting.google.com... > > Sorry, this doesn't make sense to me. Unless I'm missing something, I > > don't think it's possible for Wide_Character'Value ever to return > > False in GNAT or in most other implementations. > > I think you meant to say that it is not possible for Wide_Character'Valid to > return False. I can guarantee that Wide_Character'Value does not return > False, since Wide_Character'Value returns Wide_Character, not Boolean. Yep. Typographically'Valid ("Wide_Character'Value") = False. -- Adam