From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ea92c0e5255811d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-04 14:43:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-han1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Way OT: Adam Smith and Software Markets/Word Processing Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <3E64D7DE.512CE499@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: d2-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1046817837 3829 134.91.1.15 (4 Mar 2003 22:43:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 22:43:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/831)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34880 Date: 2003-03-04T22:43:57+00:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote: : I do find old typewriter documents hard to read now (eg, mid-80s : document on an Ada-based OS -- Pulse?). All the same, I really don't : think that you can measure quality in a document by the quality of the : typesetting or the number of different fonts used. Yes, but actually, you can measure some of the _typographic_ quality by the number of fonts used. It should be low, too many fonts lead to fontitis. This is not just a matter of taste, but empirical evidence, and taught to every typsetting apprentice. There are even some aspects that can be measured using light: the black:white ratio per area should be homogenous on the page (in a book: both pages), unless you want eye *catch*ers.