From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c92999d3d36edb6c,start X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: MinGW Ada compiler licence question targeting commercial applications Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.91.74.92 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1245267428 8900 127.0.0.1 (17 Jun 2009 19:37:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.91.74.92; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6496 Date: 2009-06-17T12:37:08-07:00 List-Id: Hello all of you, The Ada 2005 compiler, GNAT GPS licence states that this compiler cannot be used for commercial applications (if I'm not wrong). The MinGW compiler suite licence give access to create commercial applications (if I'm still not wrong). But what about the Ada 2005 compiler which comes with MinGW ? It has something to deal with GNAT, isn't it ? So can I use it to comile commercial applications ? Note : this is a for a near futur attempt, I do not know if weither or not this gonna works find, if weither or not I gonna earn anything. I'm not sure (as people on the web does not like this kind of things, this may be rejected). Further more, this will be for very low cost applications (something which will be paid via SMS+ and the like), so I cannot risk to lose anything buying a too much expensive licence, althought if it goes fine, I will obviously agree to give some percent of my earns to a compiler provider. I will not use any of Qt or GTK for Ada, so I have no question about these libriraries (will use my own), althought some one else may be interested in this question.