From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ea92c0e5255811d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-04 11:53:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Way OT: Adam Smith and Software Markets/Word Processing Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <3E64D7DE.512CE499@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: d2-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1046807602 2206 134.91.1.15 (4 Mar 2003 19:53:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:53:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/831)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:34873 Date: 2003-03-04T19:53:22+00:00 List-Id: Frank J. Lhota wrote: : Yes, but one of the results is that the quality of documents has improved. Documents of high quality should be produced (as opposed to processed, maybe) using typsetting software, not word processing software. Ask your friendly typographer.