From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32fe290813aec20 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!news.belwue.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: (slightly OT) Open Source licences? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <6d63c543-0a35-4c39-a330-98c63a24f64d@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:26:13 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Jan 2008 21:26:15 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: e0c0d92b.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=Vkl:c7kncXaJ00P1S40fZg4IUK\BH3Yb_I;:J?P033hDNcfSJ;bb[eIRnRBaCd On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:36:48 -0800 (PST), framefritti@gmail.com wrote: > I would like to > make the library available with an open-source licence, but not GPL > since I understand that the clause that any derivative work must be > GPLed (maybe I am not precise here, but please do not flame me ;-) > keeps professional away from GPLed library. Would not GMGPL be OK? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GMGPL -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de