From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25d5234e7b6ca361
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-27 12:27:22 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pc2-ware1-6-cust39.lutn.cable.ntl.COM!not-for-mail
From: "Mark Thornton" <m.p.thornton@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada versus language-X and "getting real work done" (was): 64 bit
 addressing and OOP
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:27:18 -0000
Message-ID: <b3lsb9$1nphjc$1@ID-139894.news.dfncis.de>
References: <mvul4v00ftbai2g6duuh0r38jpii2qvpjl@4ax.com>
 <HA8sq6.6AL@bath.ac.uk> <a3eaa964.0302132057.7568b83d@posting.google.com>
 <slrnb4qo0n.q3u.mbkennelSPAMBEGONE@lyapunov.ucsd.edu>
 <a3eaa964.0302141953.16f72dfe@posting.google.com>
 <3E4E8F8C.9C096985@adaworks.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302250710.5549baaf@posting.google.com>
 <3E5C7033.BD5DC462@adaworks.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302260618.7506cba7@posting.google.com>
 <3E5CF5C6.84822F57@adaworks.com>
 <a3eaa964.0302261422.4d166fa1@posting.google.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302270726.665fee77@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc2-ware1-6-cust39.lutn.cable.ntl.com (81.96.119.39)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1046377641 58508908 81.96.119.39 (16 [139894])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:59426 comp.object:58542
 comp.lang.ada:34687
Date: 2003-02-27T20:27:18+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"soft-eng" <softeng3456@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:9fa75d42.0302270726.665fee77@posting.google.com...
> xanthian@well.com (Kent Paul Dolan) wrote in message
news:<a3eaa964.0302261422.4d166fa1@posting.google.com>...
>
> > Whitewash, because what had actually happened was a
> > rebellion among the services, that should have had a large
> > number of officers cashiered if not court-martialed.  Abuse
>
> Now wait a minute, I thought the "exemption" system
> was fully authorized and legal.  Why should anybody
> be court-martialed for taking advantage of
> a feature of the system?

For manufacturing bogus or inadequate excuses. It isn't illegal to run
aground either, but I believe a court martial is then mandatory and you had
better have damned good excuse. Keep in mind that the poster is apparently a
retired Naval officer and that military justice has significant differences
from the civilian legal system.

Mark Thornton