From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a6fe9ef21ba269dc X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:01:00 -0500 From: Brian Drummond Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Smileys in C++ lib Conversion Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:08:29 +0100 Reply-To: brian@shapes.demon.co.uk Message-ID: References: <1a9b39b0-73f6-497c-a8f4-abf8129886ac@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <9b88e5a4-c588-4997-ad5c-2efa216fe4f4@a4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <95tc66hjv3stdk0nhdv9o46e5l2ecdog5j@4ax.com> <15cdcb9e-3747-48e3-9be0-8829dfbcc3c8@w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-WDnSTq1wAmEY94T+0RajvPjZNS+fV0snK6HbSBwIWFO1p8i8gjj5MQL232TarwM5gtMRNPAT1eL/Yz/!kRvrqD3eSpKV0sGkt5QHUzKAXTITDm9HSx5yl+y6bNFIwJEA8kw6kqrCM4EPUanrmy3bGWhaFQxF!d+Q= X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13402 Date: 2010-08-16T13:08:29+01:00 List-Id: On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:04:54 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Sobczak wrote: >On 15 Sie, 03:16, Brian Drummond wrote: > >> >Yes, this is a good practice. It is better to avoid using preprocessor >> >for anything other than so called include guards. >> >> Except when the result doesn't work! > >If the result of *not* using preprocessor doesn't work, then with >preprocessor it would be even worse. >Example, please. Example that shows that I cannot use const object >where constant is expected. > >(Hint: there are some *very* obscure corner cases with templates, but >if you are there already, you are screwed anyway.) >> In this instance I wanted to declare an array whose size was the constant >> expression in question. > >const int size = 7; >int array[size]; error: variably modifed 'array' at file scope - Brian