From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,ec6f74e58e86b38b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Lost in translation (with SPARK user rules)
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <b377ab0d-7573-4172-80a7-5138d488ede4@40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
References: <op.vda45rsfule2fv@garhos>
 <0466e131-cc80-4db4-b080-eec9aefcb1c7@z17g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>
	<op.vda7dlc2ule2fv@garhos> <4bfd2d05$0$27598$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
	<siotu5lyiw08.u5c5kcrly3i2$.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vdbu2ksqxmjfy8@garhos>
	<1jo6gjejsy828$.e9dx6txqbazd$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4bfd998c$0$2359$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
	<4bfebb3f$0$27571$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.205.192.70
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1275039552 944 127.0.0.1 (28 May 2010 09:39:12
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:39:12 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.205.192.70;
	posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.16)
	Gecko/2009121610 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12114
Date: 2010-05-28T02:39:12-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 27 Maj, 20:34, Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net> wrote:

> Just curious, why do you feel that you still need to write tests after
> having run successfully the SPARK proof checker?

Because the SPARK proof checker does not guarantee the lack of
infinite loops in the program?

--
Maciej Sobczak