From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,3488d9e5d292649f
X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6a2e4a4c0d7d8a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-20 14:30:05 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: status of PL/I as a viable language
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:26:40 -0500
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <b33ks1$tmn$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: <mHZ0a.42983$jM5.108891@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
 <nRg1a.190899$HG.32437469@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>
 <3E51908E.9CCA3412@adaworks.com>
 <8Gh4a.7455$_c6.743959@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
 <3E51ABCE.5491B9A2@adaworks.com> <b2spe6$p23$1@helle.btinternet.com>
 <3E5273DE.2050206@cox.net> <3E531E6F.BDFB2599@adaworks.com>
 <3E546C45.4010406@cox.net> <3E54F926.441D5BB5@adaworks.com>
 <1045763933.848350@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <42EA55F4BE83950E.F1DA277C2FDC157B.C804C1C52FE95D65@lp.airnews.net>
 <1045769690.126389@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Reply-To: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.pl1:4376 comp.lang.ada:34315
Date: 2003-02-20T17:26:40-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1045769690.126389@master.nyc.kbcfp.com...
> John R. Strohm wrote:
> > So what's your point?
>
> My point is that the attitude I often sense on this newsgroup
> is that using Ada will give you perfect code. (Not in so many
> words, mind you, but definitely in attitude.)
>

Well I can't help you with your senses ;) but I do not sense that attitude
in the majority of the posters for CLA.  Perhaps you are confusing it with
the "Let the compiler detect those simple program errors so you can
concentrate on the complex errors" altitude.  Naturally this leads to the
feeling (or sense) that Ada helps build more reliable programs.

-CRM