From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b7f81184e76b0532 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-29 23:04:38 PST From: "Dr. Michael Paus" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada In Crosstalk Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:04:37 +0100 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Message-ID: References: <3E34330C.62C5A6F0@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p508302d4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.online.de 1043910278 20059 80.131.2.212 (30 Jan 2003 07:04:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@online.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Jan 2003 07:04:38 GMT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.arcor-online.net!news.belwue.de!news.uni-ulm.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33593 Date: 2003-01-30T07:04:38+00:00 List-Id: Wes Groleau wrote: >>> http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2003/02/ >> >> >> Could everybody who is not able to get onto this server like me >> please post here. Maybe that wakes up some people and makes them >> aware of the fact that Ada advertising is useless if lots of people >> simply cannot read it. > > > Dr. Paus: > > If .mil is blocking your machine, perhaps you could > still view the site via some intermediary. For example, > > http://www.anonymizer.com will retrieve a web page > and serve you a re-creation of it. Many thanks for the hint. I'd never thought that this might work but it does. I always thought the problem is related to some security issues and therefore I did not expect a well known anonymyzer to work and so I never tried it. Michael