From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8fd45d32d7c94df3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!8g2000prt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: User Defined Storage Pool : did you ever experiment with it ?
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <b1904d91-bdb3-4ab6-ac17-7a43d0a0de58@8g2000prt.googlegroups.com>
References: <op.vpont3pqule2fv@garhos>
 <ihk0te$e26@news.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE>
 <op.vpt6fwhyule2fv@garhos> <op.vpt8agtdule2fv@garhos>
 <ihl9et$a1e$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <op.vqhzfuuyule2fv@garhos> <iipr4e$sh5$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.62.25.110
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1297119599 24420 127.0.0.1 (7 Feb 2011 22:59:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:59:59 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 8g2000prt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.62.25.110;
 posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/3.6.10,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16955
Date: 2011-02-07T14:59:58-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 7, 11:18=A0pm, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:

> Combined with the indexing aspect, you'll be able to write something like=
:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0Foo(1).Bar :=3D 10;
>
> For a vector container Foo whose elements are a record type with a compon=
ent
> Bar. And even:
>
> =A0 =A0 Text_Map ("Ada").Count :=3D 1;
>
> For an indefinite map.

Great!

But then - will this be implementable in a way that is simple enough
to allow reasonable inlining [*]? Remember that this feature will be
inevitably compared to C++. If Ada gets the performance part right,
this feature will sell very well.

[*] For the sake of comparison, the passive iterator idiom that is
currently used with containers is not inline-friendly.

--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com