From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: christoph.grein@eurocopter.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: anonymous access type
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <b17be97d-422b-41a0-9b58-3aa1f4a4fd6f@u1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
References: <d1fb109a-13d6-4884-9e71-304a58c46e62@w9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
	<51889345-8760-4804-b706-36a436810719@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
	<940b94f3-72b7-420d-8c5f-232fb9a7e9b3@v1g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
	<e29a593e-1e58-4265-a673-47a237f26cfd@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<wcctz69z38a.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <gonapi$mqo$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.156.44.178
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1236243121 12781 127.0.0.1 (5 Mar 2009 08:52:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.156.44.178;
	posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
 .NET
	CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30;
 .NET CLR
	3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 webwasher (Webwasher 6.8.3.4214)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4935
Date: 2009-03-05T00:52:01-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Out coding standard requires always "in".

I personally (when not obliged otherwise by the coding standard) use
"in" only for procedures. If "[in] out" will be allowed for functions,
I'll perhaps change my attitude.