From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,811674947553ef14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-23 12:24:23 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: jukano@visto.com (Julio Cano)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT: Meaning of the word "free"
Date: 23 Nov 2001 12:24:23 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <b158f650.0111231224.677c53b7@posting.google.com>
References: <5LHYDjy2Mcfg@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <b158f650.0111220946.2ee7020b@posting.google.com>
 <9tjno3$fhi$1@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.37.149.149
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1006547063 10791 127.0.0.1 (23 Nov 2001 20:24:23
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Nov 2001 20:24:23 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16912
Date: 2001-11-23T20:24:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Adrian Knoth <adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote in message news:<9tjno3$fhi$1@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>...
> Julio Cano <jukano@visto.com> wrote:
> 
> > but can't find a word for "bug-free", just expresions like "libre de
> > errores", "libre de fallos" or "sin fallos".
> 
> But this is a restriction of your language. In German you might use
> "fehlerfrei" which would be a direct translation of "error-free".

Something alike happens to Ada when compared to C++ like languages
(Java, etc.). I mean, by example:
C++:
     Jhony.run();
Ada:
     run (Jhony);

Isn't it like that? It doesn't mean Ada is not OO.

> It is a well known drawback of "French-like" languages (roman anchestory?)
> which use the "reverse expression", commonly with "of/de/avec".

Is it a drawback in Ada too? 
The way we see that is that then 'saxon' way is the reversed one ;)

Bye.