From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f49:: with SMTP id x70-v6mr15576283ioi.107.1526343649762; Mon, 14 May 2018 17:20:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4814:: with SMTP id c20-v6mr1009499otf.6.1526343648674; Mon, 14 May 2018 17:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader5.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!u74-v6no3346085itb.0!news-out.google.com!f20-v6ni3744itd.0!nntp.google.com!v8-v6no3304677itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 17:20:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.240.211.224; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.211.224 References: <42387d28-c983-4e58-9522-815ccd1ad0fb@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: little precision about anonymous access types From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 00:20:49 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 2118 X-Received-Body-CRC: 263907962 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52350 Date: 2018-05-14T17:20:48-07:00 List-Id: Thanks. Now I've gotten my hands on Barnes' book (hourra !!), I couldn't help go s= traight to the access types' chapter. I don't why I so like this part, desp= ite that I already have been able to see how much the semantic of "referenc= es" is different (and a pain in the neck) than of normal variables. so the book says: type cell is record next: access cell; value: data; end record; even though unchecked_deallocation doesn't work, I can't believe this featu= re would have be included without some sort of assurance that it could be d= eallocated, automatically. Otherwise it would be nothing short of insanely = crazy batshit.