From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,88e7ef9008757431 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: b-collins@home.com (Bob Collins) Subject: Re: Function Calls by Address Date: 1999/09/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 521883277 References: <37CADE68.6AF06F5D@escmail.orl.lmco.com> <37CEEFFA.7D73F78D@magic.fr> <7qooh7$hbh$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37CFFEA6.921CBE59@magic.fr> <7qp5oo$2un@hobbes.crc.com> <7qptoa$cul$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37D2E1A7.CAC3F923@magic.fr> <7qvasf$sno$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37D41767.CEB186F4@magic.fr> <7r1cro$9pf$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news.rdc1.va.home.com 936660938 24.2.56.132 (Mon, 06 Sep 1999 16:35:38 PDT) Organization: @Home Network NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 16:35:38 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <7r1cro$9pf$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Robert Dewar wrote: > [Much useful and interesting stuff snipped.] > SO, once again, I think that ??emstop is a very nice example > of how subunits can be used in a neat way, with minimal > syntactic overhead, to achieve exactly what is wanted. > [More useful and interesting stuff snipped.] Thwre is only one version of ??emstop.adb in my version of GNAT 3.11p (MachTen), with null bodies for all the subprograms. Can you post an example? I am interested in ideas on handling different hardware configurations with roughly the same basic set of compilation units. -- Bob Collins