From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fed2e7871ca258cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-18 13:54:46 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: List Container Strawman 1.4 Date: 18 Dec 2001 15:54:44 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <87k7vkxkdw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1008712485 5169 192.135.80.34 (18 Dec 2001 21:54:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18072 Date: 2001-12-18T15:54:44-06:00 List-Id: In article <87k7vkxkdw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer writes: > "Mark Lundquist" writes: > >>> What about a generic version of To and From which can handle arrays >>> with different index types? >> >> Interesting idea, but I doubt if it would be useful enough to be justified. >> A list abstraction of this sort is unbounded, and since the only reason you >> would convert To it from one of these things with a non-integer index type >> would be to convert From the list back to it again, you're not going to be >> adding or deleting elements... > > Some people like to have different integer types for different things. Absolutely !!!