From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,927ff27a95e10c29 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-05 06:12:42 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dialin-145-254-036-036.arcor-ip.NET!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: generics as illness -;) (was: Re: Anybody ...) Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 15:13:11 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-036-036.arcor-ip.net (145.254.36.36) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1041775962 14060698 145.254.36.36 (16 [77047]) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32571 Date: 2003-01-05T15:13:11+01:00 List-Id: Alexandre E. Kopilovitch wrote: > Robert A Duff wrote: >> >>"Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: >> >> > Generics in any form is an illness of programming languages. >> >>Why? > > Perhaps the origin of this feeling is that they (generics, templates, > etc.) are unclear conceptually, above the programming level. Yes. [I tried to explain my point of view in the original thread] > But there is good exception: functors in Standard ML. Unfortunately I do not know about Standard ML. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de