From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6fd8711d3f26013
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:08:32 -0500
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <1128779132.336469.160360@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
   <diahm1$bv0$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
 <1128856766.691404.176910@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: on the use of "limited with"
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:12:15 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4952.2800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4952.2800
Message-ID: <au-dnUHJdIodn9benZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-iHC9eKDLe8uh8XMqttKE1GNQEpK+Psy0FnXvOrmbwPB0l+Qa13SwOUDQ5bJfg8fOck4l1TJ8ZuF4dhH!vl/eKMFsXChe3hx/0pnLBlOtrshnV3Y1ome38109DGCTuc9/DR4SeRGCbD/ux/9cuMweuhGB5O7k!EI3hgzQSAQXXqA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5540
Date: 2005-10-10T19:12:15-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

<evangeli@cnam.fr> wrote in message
news:1128856766.691404.176910@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> thanks for the help
> does not seem to work neither :
>
> function get_q(my_tp : in tp) return access q.tq;
> p.ads:5:41: anonymous access type definition not allowed here

Apparently, your version of GNAT doesn't implement this feature yet.

> do i have to redefine an acces type on q.tq ?

Yes, since GNAT apparently doesn't implement anonymous access results. You
are only allowed to use the type directly in subprogram specs. if (1) it's a
tagged type; and (2) it's a parameter (not the return type).

                     Randy.