From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb264cdd67c2f20f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!213.132.189.2.MISMATCH!multikabel.net!feed20.multikabel.net!newshub2.home.nl!newshub3.home.nl!home.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!news.netcologne.de!nhp.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <05lkrrojfd.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <4fstb4F1kgmekU1@individual.net> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:11:59 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Jun 2006 15:11:59 MEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 3e18a716.newsread4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=f3Fl1B<50XdIeeCiY5g2Vc:ejgIfPPlddjW\KbG]kaMh]kI_X=5Keafo;AeMbPdSjn[6LHn;2LCVn7enW;^6ZC`dIXm65S@:3>o X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4925 Date: 2006-06-23T15:11:59+02:00 List-Id: On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:26:32 -0400, Stephen Leake wrote: > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > >> + GPL editions compilers still look more buggy than 3.15p. GPL 2005 is >> definitely worse. > > Well, that may be true for your applications. > > I encountered no bugs with GPL 2006; while 3.15p has significant bugs. > > In a system as complex as a compiler, different people will have > different problems. Yes. Note, I didn't say "is more boggy." I did "looks more buggy." BTW, my experience with GCC 4.0.2 (20051125) GNAT was rather positive. Guys at sourceforge are doing a great job. Many thanks to them. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de