From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e859574a5456f943,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: arioch@cs.uwa.oz.au (Darren Brown)
Subject: Ada95 Compiler Performance / Ada95 X bindings?
Date: 1997/01/29
Message-ID: <arioch.854507844@ss1>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 212991712
sender: usenet@ccis.adisys.com.au (usenet)
organization: ADI Limited
keywords: Ada95 GNAT
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
summary: Query for information regarding Ada 95 Compiler Performance
 Comparisons
Date: 1997-01-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



Two quick queries:

1. I noticed a post the other day comparing the performance of the GNAT and
   ALSYS compilers.

   Is there any further information to be had on Ada95 compiler performance? 

2. Does anyone have any recommendations on Ada95 X bindings

Thanks,

Darren.
arioch@ccis.adisys.com.au
ADI Limited.

PS. Could any responses be directed to me (and to the newsgroup if you like),
    as our news feed is expired almost before it arrives :(