"Stephen Leake" <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> a �crit dans le message
news: u3cqg9b8l.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov...
> Fraser Wilson <newsfraser@blancolioni.org> writes:
>
> > ...  Isn't there a preference hierarchy from for loop to while
> > loop to loop?  I.e. use a for loop whenever possible, failing that a
> > while loop, and as a last resort a loop with an exit.  OK, and as a
> > last last resort use a goto.
>
> In my style guide, I use a for loop _only_ if the loop will _always_
> be executed exactly as indicated in the "for" part. No other loop
> exits allowed.
>
I beg to differ.
A for loop preserves you from a number of problem, especially when dealing
with limit cases.
Try to write a loop that does *exactly* what for does, and you'll see that
there are lots of benefits in using for.
For example, I always use a for in a search loop, which exits when the
element is found.

In Pascal, a for loop was always done entirely; you have to be aware that
Ada is different in that respect, but that does not mean that you should not
use a more powerful construct when you can.

--
---------------------------------------------------------
           J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr