From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,21aaebbd9205357c
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Received: by 10.180.98.103 with SMTP id eh7mr4657761wib.3.1362596485202;
        Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:01:25 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 bp2ni74912wib.1!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Please list all the Ada libraries you know
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:01:24 +0200
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Message-ID: <appi44FfggaU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ab19cb2d-ffeb-4ab9-aba6-763ec930cfd1@googlegroups.com>
 <ad59aa66-bfc9-4a7d-b004-3c911579b012@googlegroups.com>
 <op.wted5udrule2fv@cardamome>
 <69291c5f-ffce-4b48-a1c5-aa76f308082f@googlegroups.com>
 <kh1f3c$6d2$1@dont-email.me>
 <cd72c22c-a401-4aa9-959e-4b437313b3be@googlegroups.com>
 <kh6ms7$jl9$1@dont-email.me>
 <0b80a829-05d4-4f07-a954-3acb3b276d5b@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net
 jCaT6a+sG0lllg1RHcpgpQJW+/UPHgXc5/jXI/ecXfL34dwhiR8k3vZzwCQKSNKEQd
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ri08ExC/r93tIEOJ8NgGe+xqSec=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
In-Reply-To: <0b80a829-05d4-4f07-a954-3acb3b276d5b@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2013-03-06T21:01:24+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13-03-06 19:08 , Adam Beneschan wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:15:56 PM UTC-8, J-P. Rosen wrote:
>> Le 04/03/2013 21:43, Adam Beneschan a �crit :
>>
>>> Well, no, you don't "need" one.  Once you know what directory you're
>>> looking in, it's not all that difficult to look for any file whose
>>> name matches what you're looking for without regard to letter case.
>>
>> Sure. But that means doing a full directory search any time you refer to
>> a unit (just to check if by chance there is another file with the same
>> name and different casing) => a lot of disk access, and considering the
>> ratio of disk speed to memory speed nowadays, this is likely to have a
>> very sensible effect on speed for a very minor (IMHO) nuisance.
> 
> If you're trying to say "big enough that one can sense it"
> "sensible" isn't the right word--it means something totally
> different.

Dictionaries disagree. Wiktionary
(http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sensible) has its two first meanings
agreeing with J-P's usage:

1. (now dated or formal) Perceptible by the senses.
2. Easily perceived; appreciable.

The Oxford Concise Dictionary (1950 edition) has the same (1), without
tagging it dated.

Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English (1974 edition)
has "good sense" or "reasonable" as the first meaning, but "can be
perceived by the senses" as the third meaning, without tagging this
meaning dated.

So "sensible" has multiple meanings.

-- 
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
      .      @       .