From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,71c743c03ed191fe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-23 08:25:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newspeer.monmouth.com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.vt.edu!msunews!not-for-mail From: "Chad R. Meiners" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Beginer problem: variable array size Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:19:06 -0400 Organization: Michigan State University Message-ID: References: <1032789075.864322@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Reply-To: "Chad R. Meiners" NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29282 Date: 2002-09-23T11:19:06-04:00 List-Id: "Hyman Rosen" wrote in message news:1032789075.864322@master.nyc.kbcfp.com... > tmoran@acm.org wrote: > And further yet, why do you think you get to rewrite the > given requirements just because they don't suit the style of > your favorite programming language? > hmm... I don't think Tom's is advocating that requirements should be rewritten to accommodate a programming language. I believe he was stating that sometimes it is valid to rewrite requirements given known constraints of the problem. -CRM