From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7001494ace46eea7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-23 05:41:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.73.101.75!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Overriding discriminants perplexes GNAT 3.14p Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1032784885 21197 134.91.1.34 (23 Sep 2002 12:41:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:41:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29274 Date: 2002-09-23T12:41:25+00:00 List-Id: Dmitry A.Kazakov wrote: : My point was simple, a wider use gives a better product. The : bugs I saw in GNAT would be detected earlier if more software were written : in Ada and compiled with GNAT, just a statistical observation. Maybe. But only if a higher number of program writers uses a higher number of all kinds of language features in different program contexts. As a test for the statistical observation, are the popular compilers for other languages better by the factor of OtherLanguageProgramAuthors / Ada_Program_Authors? -- Georg