From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e0fa6eae2c537e3d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:24:10 -0500 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:23:55 -0400 From: "Peter C. Chapin" Subject: Re: GNAT.Regpat problem. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <41cae3ac-97b6-4b01-ad73-9ff1ec2fdf86@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23) X-X-Sender: pcc09070@vtc.vsc.edu@webmail.vtc.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-eV8tD/s91TOjs1fs+gfXs72TPcGrijqMDyBoOvyAvoiEYKcXuCRXuxCLD35DI0Fvkgp0Zl3f6f1ib5f!AZBP9atwzl8ixpb6S095Hog/TACP9pAbayB+e+dBSrJRnna4IfsLALgCLBBEDNYDSz/RBHh9PQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 1867 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18419 Date: 2011-03-24T06:23:55-04:00 List-Id: On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Simon Wright wrote: > Adam Beneschan writes: > > There's certanly something fishy with 4.5.2; it appears not to notice > when it goes off the end, heaven knows where the extra elements of the > matcher go. > > Looking at the GCC SVN log for s-regpat.adb, I see > > 2010-06-21 Emmanuel Briot > > * s-regpat.adb (Link_Tail): Fix error when size of the pattern matcher > is too small. Thanks to all who replied to my original post. It seems like there is a known bug in GNAT.Regpat that affects certain GNAT versions. I can deal with that. Thanks again. Peter