From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e3f191debc78584 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:05:49 -0600 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:05:37 -0500 From: "Peter C. Chapin" Subject: Re: Can Ada be hacked? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <215154cd-f0bf-4138-b294-776d4e058592@o30g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <2561745b-7720-470d-a6ee-67f1d0e8cff0@v11g2000prb.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23) X-X-Sender: pcc09070@vtc.vsc.edu@webmail.vtc.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="392995-11299-1299521148=:5656" X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-ohFNNNtFxjC7pQt5NWwhNUJcsK2Y0y314hK2bHwH6JdR/hiu769yfzg7abqSvKCMrTNZ71G7NaII+qb!BvNPxC746C5Zi4OuXvQQUej5jGO0PubNBkzyoUnmQb77jIC5QEV7mMrXMdnhxzQ/J7DMxzZcHQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2745 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17950 Date: 2011-03-07T13:05:37-05:00 List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --392995-11299-1299521148=:5656 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Yannick Duch=C3=AAne (Hibou57) wrote: > Many page requires user interaction, so a kind of programmatic is require= d=20 > to animate any HTML version. And as George said in this thread, browsers= =20 > now looks like a platform on their own, and this platform sometime=20 > requires its applications, which are the plugins (mainly to play medias).= =20 > You could do many worthy browsing with a pure HTML browser, like going to= =20 > AdaIC for some news (:-)), but sooner or later you will go frustrated. I suppose people interested in using a high integrity web browser as a fron= t=20 end for a critical application would be in control of both the client and= =20 the server. As such they could design the server side to cater to the=20 limitations of the specialized client. Browsing arbitrary Internet sites even with a browser that just enforces=20 standards would be a disaster. Imposing other limitations would definitely= =20 be impractical. I agree with you there. Peter --392995-11299-1299521148=:5656--