From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f15b862e11b575a4 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 05:20:26 -0600 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 06:20:08 -0500 From: "Peter C. Chapin" Subject: Re: Air traffic control system in Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4d6ffe16$0$17930$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com> <835e91b1-50f7-4b20-beaf-5b5afcc66cc5@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <4d701d79$0$17918$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com> <4d711c62$0$27719$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d712326$0$27719$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d712b6a$0$17204$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <0b3daa32-8571-4a7f-a96f-cd876f4c4127@d12g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <4d712e64$0$17204$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <1l023eg1ilrni.xwge3tgrabol$.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23) X-X-Sender: pcc09070@vtc.vsc.edu@webmail.vtc.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-UcbsMA0jbCczuNc02uJ6+yW9lVDx5Fmh2m6HP9BOY8ovtA6EgPPtIEKEiuMByI9wyGYXfnmVRLRWeHV!WNmIcR0L34GGFLAkTsCQ8tqTzU4joTtC91Ps4Rii6JYJ9Y86HixyMk88tiRXTr0upwWU/3KwyQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2549 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18858 Date: 2011-03-05T06:20:08-05:00 List-Id: On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Randy Brukardt wrote: > And the work to define a standard GUI to the level required for the Ada > standard would be immense, especially in order to prevent tying it to any > underlying target. (We'd want it to work on both Windows and Linux for > instance, without requiring either of them.) And I don't see anyone really > stepping up to do that work. The C++ standard also does not include a standardized graphical interface. I'm sure the reasons are the same. It hasn't seemed to have hurt C++'s popularity much... I'm sure for the same reasons as outlined in this thread. Peter