From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab3fadb7cac7363c
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Colin Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: using `use' : what is the best practice ?
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:07:21 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1106080904420.11805@Bluewhite64.example.net>
References: <57e75a35-058c-4172-9a3d-e11e7c5f7697@l2g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <15kaiizx7r3pu$.3bgefr92z5i7$.dlg@40tude.net> <m21uz560ir.fsf@pushface.org>
 <1ofcb8g6dasre.uvhg77u842n6$.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="kheEuXGHhE2Z5eF1gAST+A";
	logging-data="437"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KyVh9HnjfYedCwLvuEpyCKMfr0guXi1cFy21K3x7Aeg=="
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
In-Reply-To: <1ofcb8g6dasre.uvhg77u842n6$.dlg@40tude.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GGg4WRodmILpwgHNyffG5cDzMOQ=
X-X-Sender: Colin_Paul@Bluewhite64.example.net
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:20667
Date: 2011-06-08T09:07:21+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> sent on June 7th, 2011:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"[..]                                                                   |
|                                                                        |
|In                                                                      |
|                                                                        |
|   with P; use P;                                                       |
|                                                                        |
|the "with P" is meaningless here.                                       |
|                                                                        |
|"With" does not carry any useful information for the reader. You have to|
|manage sets of "with" as you develop your packages. [..]                |
|[..]                                                                    |
|                                                                        |
|[..]"                                                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Agreed. VHDL does not need this redundancy.