From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,e276c1ed16429c03 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicholas Collin Paul Gloster Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada is getting more popular! Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:58:03 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <4cc4cb65$0$6985$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <5086cc5e-cd51-4222-a977-06bdb4fb3430@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <14fkqzngmbae6.zhgzct559yc.dlg@40tude.net> <8732ea65-1c69-4160-9792-698c5a2e8615@g13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <4cc60705$0$23764$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc6753c$0$23756$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc71e08$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc87d7a$0$23755$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4cc912e1$0$23761$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="kheEuXGHhE2Z5eF1gAST+A"; logging-data="6851"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oWf5sc2SdeZHLVbXKyG0vbSI6Fi2PEBQz1DtniWxTPA==" User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:eAtTWR7lLZSZTkQtwfp7OjEZitM= X-X-Sender: Colin_Paul@Bluewhite64.example.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14900 Date: 2010-10-28T17:58:03+00:00 List-Id: J-P. Rosen sent on October 28th, 2010: |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[..] | | | |[..] | |[..] After all, | |FOSS means "free and open source software", so there must be a difference...| |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| Conjunction does not require disjunction. |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[..] a design | |whose structure is oriented by the notion of object, which does not | |necessarily imply classification and inheritence." | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| Agreed. |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |" The latter should | |better be called "classification oriented design". | | | |[..]" | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| Did class-based object orientation go out of fashion? One can use classes without inheritance. Why would "classification oriented design" necessarily involve inheritance? Yours sincerely, Nicholas Collin Paul