From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,47fc49812a5e8e38
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: small example, using complex variables in Ada
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:48:19 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1006101544390.3765@Bluewhite64.example.net>
References: <hunrki$ph7$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <6e70b80b-3030-479f-8378-d1281d1fa847@d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="kheEuXGHhE2Z5eF1gAST+A";
	logging-data="21764"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19fyVnWxrPINkHrV2MHexxXoPhdR9wnRPANMv5Tq4q0qA=="
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
In-Reply-To: 
 <6e70b80b-3030-479f-8378-d1281d1fa847@d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wJ+BJ+TubrWEQD7pXs0BkJ7pqXs=
X-X-Sender: Colin_Paul@Bluewhite64.example.net
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:12569
Date: 2010-06-10T15:48:19+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Ludovic Brenta sent:

|--------------------------------------------|
|"[..]                                       |
|     Two_Pi_Over_N : constant := 2 * Pi / N;|
|[..]"                                       |
|--------------------------------------------|

That is a good suggestion.

|--------------------------------------------|
|"     FOR k in X'range LOOP"                |
|--------------------------------------------|

No.

|--------------------------------------------|
|"         FOR m in data'range LOOP          |
|[..]"                                       |
|--------------------------------------------|

No. Loop down to zero. If utilizing FOR instead of WHILE, then utilize
REVERSE.

Additionally, loop unrolling should be considered.