From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 108717,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,gid5b1e799cdb,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!188.40.43.213.MISMATCH!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Colin Paul Gloster Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.pascal,comp.programming Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3? Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:46:47 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <4BA8BA91.4050905@cherrystonesoftware.com> <4BA8F677.3090206@adalog.fr> <4BA8FD54.8020200@cherrystonesoftware.com> Reply-To: Colin Paul Gloster Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: feeder.eternal-september.org; logging-data="9909"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ald35cJvldy05habBbBjFn9Zv34YUunr6ELH7lmCCwQ==" User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) In-Reply-To: <4BA8FD54.8020200@cherrystonesoftware.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:1IDFfG8LECUqyo9lIL1tXbD8ytI= X-X-Sender: Colin_Paul@Bluewhite64.example.net Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.eiffel:592 comp.lang.ada:10738 comp.lang.modula3:161 comp.programming:16487 Date: 2010-03-25T15:46:47+00:00 List-Id: On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Jim Balson wrote: |-------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[..] | | | |If we were to add another language to our benchmarks, Pascal would be the| |logical choice." | |-------------------------------------------------------------------------| FORTRAN-77 code on a good machine would be faster if no heap usage is needed. |-------------------------------------------------------------------------| |" And we may do it at some point in the future. We're certainly | |going to add many more algorithms to the testing as time permits." | |-------------------------------------------------------------------------| Good.