From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,20280f498071efd3 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!188.40.43.213.MISMATCH!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Colin Paul Gloster Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Software Quality in Science Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:20:42 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <1198a288-b013-45a8-907f-7fe227e6294e@m27g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <04185bf3-f83a-4fbe-b380-c6d8aa4105e6@w27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <87fx59p725.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Reply-To: Colin Paul Gloster Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: feeder.eternal-september.org; posting-host="kheEuXGHhE2Z5eF1gAST+A"; logging-data="22014"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jMTrvPKdjg5GLqg7/DN+41K/vB4Er7YmmOoE3GY+EOQ==" User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) In-Reply-To: <87fx59p725.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Cancel-Lock: sha1:sVlKq0ZpS+wDWGHxryIkbCOp/Xg= X-X-Sender: Colin_Paul@Bluewhite64.example.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9222 Date: 2010-02-15T11:20:42+00:00 List-Id: On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Florian Weimer wrote: |-------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[..] | | | |even lines of code) vary as much among programmers [..]" | |-------------------------------------------------------------------| Of course. In C++ I produce if(condition) { statement; } but I have been profiling C++ code by someone else which contained instead if (condition) statement; which with a profiler which profiles per line instead of per statement does not enlighten me as to whether or not the condition has ever been true. |-------------------------------------------------------------------| |"[..] This is a bit sad because it means that | |language design does not really matter as far as actual results are| |concerned. | | | |[..]" | |-------------------------------------------------------------------| You were mistaken.