From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 5b1e799cdb,3ef3e78eacf6f938
X-Google-Attributes: gid5b1e799cdb,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mail
From: Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3,comp.programming
Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3?
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:40:39 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907211439000.6493@Bluewhite64.example.net>
References: <h3sln0$rhm$2@news.eternal-september.org>
 <0.603519b4031952a6b8a9.20090718184108BST.87k52551or.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <h41hg9$bk1$3@news.eternal-september.org>
 <oYmdnReTFOx9AvjXnZ2dnUVZ8iOdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Reply-To: Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: news.eternal-september.org
 U2FsdGVkX1/DXgyBNfFGQR655zrx4Rntnw2VkkSPJmI+y1P853Yz925gMs6zSotcip4SAEHPhnrj9ahB642uw9QQFB8hOpmKCKwgEsPmTho85fzStDWIEmS+cY1cBYPNlOJmsnXOXocMQYN4GLxrJwtYAiZ9puMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eternal-september.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:39:58 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <oYmdnReTFOx9AvjXnZ2dnUVZ8iOdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
X-Auth-Sender: 
 U2FsdGVkX1+rry7dKgCLo9posTIGrMe5hlkspYLswFejD9M+CV4QeorRFpj2vjnUjnykG+6CR90=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:B3YY6USw2T0aSDBRW+KSwPgBUV0=
X-X-Sender: Colin_Paul@Bluewhite64.example.net
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.eiffel:360 comp.lang.ada:7230
 comp.lang.modula3:68 comp.programming:11943
Date: 2009-07-21T14:40:39+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Jon Harrop wrote:

|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"Nicholas Paul Collin Gloucester wrote:                               |
|> Why Objective Caml instead of JoCaml; G'Caml; Chamau; BIGLOO; HimML;|
|> CeML; or Gaml?                                                      |
|                                                                      |
|[..] Bigloo which is a Scheme                                         |
|implementation and, therefore, is not statically typed.               |
|                                                                      |
|[..]"                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

I am sorry for making that mistake.