From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: backlog2.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.unit0.net!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.uni-weimar.de!medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de!lucks From: Stefan.Lucks@uni-weimar.de Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: library/binding for sftp? Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:26:39 +0200 Organization: Bauhaus-Universitaet Weimar Message-ID: References: <9oo34px7j5ko$.1j7bcnxwzgcxe.dlg@40tude.net><20130808111404.5fc6ce14@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se><1nfcrgjw8vkrb.1aukq12ys882l$.dlg@40tude.net><20130808133709.09dfef98@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> <20130809104904.6ca91de2@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-2038106412-1377343601=:21854" X-Trace: tigger.scc.uni-weimar.de 1377343588 25556 141.54.178.228 (24 Aug 2013 11:26:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@tigger.scc.uni-weimar.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:26:28 +0000 (UTC) X-X-Sender: lucks@debian In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183122 Date: 2013-08-24T13:26:39+02:00 List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-2038106412-1377343601=:21854 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, David Thompson wrote: > Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:06:46 -0400 > From: David Thompson > Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada > Subject: Re: library/binding for sftp? >=20 > On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:14:47 +0200, Stefan.Lucks@uni-weimar.de wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Randy Brukardt wrote: > > > >>> If you need public connections, then surely use SSH. >> >> Agreed. Which is what the OP has been asking about, namely sftp (which i= s >> ftp + ssh). >> > Not quite. SFTP is a new protocol which provides functions similar to > and clearly based on FTP, run over SSH, but SFTP is not the same as > FTP over SSH (which is technically possible but rarely if ever used). I am aware of that. SFTP uses SSH and provides the FTP functionality, to=20 the user, but inenally it is very different from the awfully complex FTP=20 over SSH. > As a user you can generally ignore the difference -- you still type > DIR and GET and PUT and it looks about the same -- but if you are > implementing the protocol it makes a big difference and even if you're > just binding to an existing implementation, which was the start to > this thread, some differences may be significant. > ------ I love the taste of Cryptanalysis in the morning! ------ --Stefan.Lucks (at) uni-weimar.de, Bauhaus-Universit=E4t Weimar, Germany-- --8323329-2038106412-1377343601=:21854--