From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:46:21 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:46:18 -0500
From: Peter Chapin <PChapin@vtc.vsc.edu>
X-X-Sender: pcc09070@WIL414CHAPIN.vtc.vsc.edu
Subject: Re: What exactly is the licensing situation with GNAT?
In-Reply-To: <m44ea9$s8s$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.CYG.2.11.1411140744580.7264@WIL414CHAPIN.vtc.vsc.edu>
References: <DA%7w.753721$Y4.288171@fx24.iad>
 <87fvdr2vdv.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
 <w118w.110576$5U6.95784@fx01.iad> <54609F34.4080201@spam.spam>
 <35f01472-3510-4f67-8765-006fa8591c35@googlegroups.com>
 <9tc8w.73007$ZT5.37595@fx07.iad>
 <22a3816a-4e89-48f0-a126-dce581781beb@googlegroups.com>
 <mqw8w.739469$w82.82975@fx21.iad>
 <cd91630f-d78d-4eab-830c-f71005e93fc0@googlegroups.com>
 <084b1934-9641-425e-85ec-293e0334413e@googlegroups.com>
 <86bf69c8-eb08-4696-b6c9-3784f5c42213@googlegroups.com>
 <Jwy8w.500685$Ub6.487517@fx20.iad>
 <d4b8f45d-e327-4d78-a0d6-838aba063e4d@googlegroups.com>
 <lyoascltws.fsf@pushface.org> <YYE8w.620042$Lj7.284655@fx22.iad>
 <87389olqie.fsf@ixod.org> <zTF8w.509165$No4.167804@fx19.iad>
 <3516753b-5304-408d-99c8-67f544fdc185@googlegroups.com>
 <d6f2eb01-e065-4804-8853-98b9ef6f575b@googlegroups.com>
 <m44ea9$s8s$1@speranza.aioe.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (CYG 23 2013-08-11)
Organization: Vermont Technical College
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: 
 sv3-gTVszoNvJOKvJDYdvzzGOwV2thbjCY5jzlM6NMjAPSUl+ZwGSr/MH6ySN5qG5eGoaQto1cio1V/ML0e!8LEFyKubksC+fQ2BinhBOqxol0Klkgdyd4sYMdGZ4qIsVVS/DuExqgv7jPUqYP5pp+IXhbAW51vS!yRGMvbakpn6b3QjrBg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2521
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23288
Date: 2014-11-14T07:46:18-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Pete Ballmer wrote:

> Other systems like LLVM would be ok except they're not supporting anything
> but Intel.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. When I look at the LLVM web site 
I see:

"An easily retargettable code generator, which currently supports X86, 
X86-64, PowerPC, PowerPC-64, ARM, Thumb, SPARC, Alpha, CellSPU, MIPS, 
MSP430, SystemZ, and XCore."

Are you saying that only the Intel support is used or gets active 
development?

Peter