From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6aa6d133611419f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-29 11:30:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pcp01485549pcs.limstn01.de.comcast.NET!not-for-mail From: Ryan Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Thought this was interesting (Bounds Checking!) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:31:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <3D6688E1.3A1797CC@san.rr.com> <1030464758.505647@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <_L0b9.434$Y3.52721@news.xtra.co.nz> <338040f8.0208280707.7f5ad9dd@posting.google.com> <3D6E561A.5080307@cogeco.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp01485549pcs.limstn01.de.comcast.net (68.82.51.136) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1030645810 54004869 68.82.51.136 (16 [151722]) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020828 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, eo Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28569 Date: 2002-08-29T14:31:09-04:00 List-Id: Larry Kilgallen wrote: > I don't see what is important about bounds checking in this case. > It is only Windows that crashed :-) Microsoft made two very bad decisions in writing Windows NT. The more obvious was forcing the whole OS to go down when only the console I/O code fails. The less obvious was writing that code in a language other than Ada :-) Ryan