From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a687662f09731bb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.71.34.3!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Quality and Style book discussion Date: 17 Nov 2005 18:44:54 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1132274620 17546 192.135.80.34 (18 Nov 2005 00:43:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6458 Date: 2005-11-17T18:44:54-06:00 List-Id: In article , Simon Wright writes: > One could always use renaming to name the parameters more conveniently > from the inside view, though it would have to be a pretty extreme case > to justify it I would have thought. I have done something like renaming the XYZ parameter to Caller_XYZ when there are lots of other XYZs floating around inside the subprogram.