From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1116ece181be1aea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-04 22:52:08 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny03.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Counter-proposal for variable arrays
References: <3F739C1D.4030907@attbi.com> <uoex8i8i9.fsf@earthlink.net>
 <na5fnvcqjdvjbutt1s7hu9mhqadjk4jemb@4ax.com> <3F78E850.8010401@comcast.net>
 <slrnbniahu.g9.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3F797748.3000203@noplace.com> <834clb.uan1.ln@skymaster>
 <3F79EF18.7060600@comcast.net>
 <slrnbnjv9h.f3.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <Y1Aeb.10094$kD3.173@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <3F7B1076.8060106@comcast.net>
 <5mknnv4u96qqudrt4bd8n4t1cljp2fjlp8@4ax.com>
 <CZOdnWbTwIxOruGiU-KYgw@gbronline.com>
 <blklum$dala6$1@ID-77047.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <1065215180.95094@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <blm0av$dkoad$3@ID-77047.news.uni-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <blm0av$dkoad$3@ID-77047.news.uni-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <akOfb.23883$kD3.11661@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 05:52:06 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.83.244.79
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: nwrdny03.gnilink.net 1065333126 162.83.244.79 (Sun,
 05 Oct 2003 01:52:06 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 01:52:06 EDT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:250
Date: 2003-10-05T05:52:06+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> Pointer arithmetics is not yet an array.

No. But an array is an array. What are you talking about?

> an array of class-wide elements forces use of all sorts of pointers.

Yeah. So what? What exactly would the implementation of an array of
class-wide elements look like, anyway?