From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c6c96fe0302f04f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-16 06:47:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.251.151.101!opentransit.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!lnewspeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.kvaerner.com!news@kvaerner.com From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: POLL: Would you use Ada more if... Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:38:32 +0200 Organization: KOGAS Message-ID: References: <3d5cc9ef.4511216@news.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 155.209.161.102 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28104 Date: 2002-08-16T15:38:32+02:00 List-Id: John McCabe > But from what I remember, when Aonix started selling various editions > of ObjectAda to compete with Visual C++, they didn't get anywhere with > it. I wonder whether people have got into the position of thinking > that, if Ada tools can be acquired at a reasonable cost, aren't they > going to be shit? I still think that the greatest obstacle is the Ada out of box experience. I have still the feeling that there is a lot of work to be done to get a toolset which makes one comfortable. greetings,