From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,718bd701b6b36346,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-12 08:09:42 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news.man.poznan.pl!pwr.wroc.pl!panorama.wcss.wroc.pl!hebisch
From: hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl (Waldek Hebisch)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT/Ada95 Streams Performance Issue
Date: 12 Aug 2002 15:09:49 GMT
Organization: Politechnika Wroclawska
Message-ID: <aj8j3t$bmn$1@panorama.wcss.wroc.pl>
References: <3D51ECC9.8020406@cogeco.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hera.math.uni.wroc.pl
X-Trace: panorama.wcss.wroc.pl 1029164989 11991 156.17.86.1 (12 Aug 2002
 15:09:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.pwr.wroc.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Aug 2002 15:09:49 GMT
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27954
Date: 2002-08-12T15:09:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Warren W. Gay VE3WWG (ve3wwg@cogeco.ca) wrote:
: 3. The individual characters that make up Msg are written
:      out to stream S, using individual calls to Character'Write.

: Step # 3 is the performance killer.

: To help in this regard, APQ 1.2 (not released yet) now supports
: two new functions for performance reasons:

:       String_Output to substitute for String'Output
:       String_Input to substitute for String'Input

: These routines deal with the array of characters as
: one block of data.

: But this is really just a patch over part of a much
: larger problem.

: How have other people dealt with this type of streams
: performance issue?  Or do people generally avoid
: streams when performance is important?

Well, I just toyed with a simple cat program:

        loop
                Ada.Text_IO.Get_Line( Line, Last );
                Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line( Line(1..Last) );
        end loop;

Using GNAT (gcc 3.1.1), I get very bad performance (about 10 MB/s, raw 
system calls (in C) give 450MB/s). I looked at the sources, and while 
Put_Line essentialy outputs the block (it makes a copy and modifies it 
slightly) Get_Line works with single characters. The problem is that to 
cooperate nicely with C Ada has to go trough C stdio interface. Since Ada 
and C semantics differ Ada cannot use C block input. The problem is magnified 
becouse each C stdio function performs locking. 

--
                              Waldek Hebisch
hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl    or hebisch@hera.math.uni.wroc.pl