"Colin Paul Gloster" <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org> a �crit dans le message news: slrnakabs0.qhs.Colin_Paul_Gloster@camac.dcu.ie...
> (The Java language advocate in the subject title is not me, and is not so
> naive as to suggest that any Java implementations are yet of sufficient
> quality to trust an unmanned orbiting craft with, but he hopes they will
> be in future. For the record, his preferences include in descending
> order: Java; C++; Ada 95; and Ada 83 (so at least he acknowledges that
> there is not simply Ada, it was followed by Ada 95.))
>
> Does anyone have any advice on this topic (given that a C++ base of his
> which he happily ported to Java used loads of MI though Java does not
> support full blown (i.e. implementation too) MI, this expert has dismissed
> using Ada 95 for a particular approach he has chosen for which his
> solutions have an affinity to MI)? Any alternate ideas to published ideas
> quoted below?, or have you come across any rumors that any of these have
> been discredited?, or any favorites?
>
>[extensive bibliography deleted]
> Thanks for feedback and pointers and hearsay.
Good opportunity for plug!

I presented a paper at Ada-Europe 2003 titled "Ada, interfaces, and the listener paradigm".
It provides a design pattern for providing all the functionnality of Java interfaces, and can easily be extende to full MI.
It is available from the proceedings (Springer), but I can send it to anybody who's interested.
It is my intent to publish it on Adalog's web site as soon as I get around to it :-)

--
---------------------------------------------------------
           J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr