From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,68f66270391b820 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-25 14:15:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!uwm.edu!msunews!not-for-mail From: "Chad R. Meiners" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Slices of 2d arrays? Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:09:16 -0400 Organization: Michigan State University Message-ID: References: <5ee5b646.0207241633.6518ef31@posting.google.com> Reply-To: "Chad R. Meiners" NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27410 Date: 2002-07-25T17:09:16-04:00 List-Id: Yes, please cite this principle. I would like to see where this principle was first stated since it does seem to be a rather intuitive principle. -CRM "Robert A Duff" wrote in message news:wccu1mnk0ri.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com... > dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes: > > > However, as soon as you extend slices to >1D arrays, the > > feature no longer obeys the "Bauer Principle" which says > > that you should not pay overhead for a feature unless > > you use it. > > Who is Bauer? Can you give a cite for his principle? > > I've always tried to obey this principle, but I never knew it had a > name. > > - Bob