"Stephen Leake" a �crit dans le message news: u8z3zzvdx.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov... > > > Coming from C++, what I used to think of as a class (a type and its > > associated methods) is now roughly equivalent to a package. Whenever I > > try to name a package, I use what I normally think of as the type > > itself. For example, I would put a vector type in a package Vector or a > > regular expression type in a package Regular_Expression. However, once > > I name the package, I am at a loss for what to call the data type inside. > See "A naming convention for classes in Ada 9X", Ada Letters Vol XV n� 2, for a discussion of a solution to this problem. You can also download the paper from http://www.adalog.fr/publica2.htm -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr