From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ed4df3963fb5a81
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-05 14:48:43 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dan@irvine.com (Dan Eilers)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GtkAda compile errors (Apex Ada)
Date: 5 Mar 2004 14:48:43 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <aff68d75.0403051448.7c1cd878@posting.google.com>
References: <mailman.65.1078478969.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1078526923 21758 127.0.0.1 (5 Mar 2004 22:48:43
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:48:43 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6099
Date: 2004-03-05T14:48:43-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote in message news:<mailman.65.1078478969.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>...
> 
> During the preparation of the 2001 Ada-France, to ease the production of
> compiler agnostic software with sexy GUI, we tried to compile GtkAda with
> ObjectAda and Apex.
> 
> We cleanup the code from GNAT specific attributes (and other stuff I don't
> remember), but we stopped this effort due to more serious problem
> (compilation errors due to different RM interpretation).
> 
> Note that GtkAda team was ready to include patch improving compiler
> compatibility.

I found that gtk-marshallers.adb has a problem with respect to AI-299,
and reported this two years ago
      http://lists.act-europe.fr/pipermail/gtkada/2002-February/001240.html
but have yet to receive a reply.

Also, gtk-handlers.adb, line 154, has a problem with respect to
AC-014,
where Signal_Id is used for both a parameter name and the function
return type.

And glib-convert.ads has a problem where glib.convert is used both as 
a child package name and the name of a nested function.

	-- Dan Eilers