From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,19924f2facf8443
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: amado.alves@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Larger matrices
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <afa48ae2-cee6-41d6-9390-5cd6b12bdfcf@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
References: <40ed91c2-3dab-4994-9a7b-4032058f0671@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
	<4899b545$0$20713$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <96f76821-fc2a-4ec1-83e7-b7b9a5be0520@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
	<9cabee20-877a-4fdc-80f8-7746879331da@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
	<Iimmk.286508$yE1.119629@attbi_s21>
 <c51a3892-b115-4d3c-ae0b-a3511578e57b@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.250.114.147
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218065597 16933 127.0.0.1 (6 Aug 2008 23:33:17
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 23:33:17 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=92.250.114.147;
	posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1;
	.NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR
	1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1483
Date: 2008-08-06T16:33:17-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Upon failing miserably to convince GNAT to use a stack of 200M, I am
currently working around the problem by writing my own matrix-by-
vector multiplication function. It takes 2 seconds for a 5000 x 5000
matrix, but it does not explode.

I continue interested in ways to augment the stack size (or another
way) to enable use of the standard library. Not so much for speed, but
more for validation (GNAT passes ACATS right? Are ACATS for this
library setup yet?)

Thanks a lot.