From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f2a0e357565ca388 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-27 04:07:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: martin.dowie@btopenworld.com (Martin Dowie) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: case tools Date: 27 Mar 2003 04:07:21 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.138.254.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1048766841 19037 127.0.0.1 (27 Mar 2003 12:07:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Mar 2003 12:07:21 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35756 Date: 2003-03-27T12:07:21+00:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote in message news:... > martin.dowie@btopenworld.com (Martin Dowie) writes: > > I guess I meant "code generation features". > > As I remember Rose Ada, you could specfy for an individual class -- > amongst many other features -- whether you wanted a > pointer-to-instance type, what it was to be called, and what an > automatically-generated parameter of this type was to be called > (defaults project-selectable, eg yes, Handle and This). > > This is "architectural" in the sense that if you're to be easily able > to write code to access structures generated from my part of the > model, it's a great help if you can _know_ what the code generation > rules are, without the possibility of my changing my part of the > mapping on a whim. Ah, ok, to me this a management thing rather than anything to do with any UML<=>Ada mapping. If you have a process that says "use the default tool settings" and someone doesn't then you take them outside and shoot them! And if you don't have a process, well, nuff said. :-)