From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-19 12:38:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dialin-145-254-048-251.arcor-ip.NET!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A.Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: status of Ada STL? Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:43:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3D10B7C6.8030309@attbi.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-048-251.arcor-ip.net (145.254.48.251) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1024515482 9556242 145.254.48.251 (16 [77047]) User-Agent: KNode/0.4 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26430 Date: 2002-06-20T09:43:19+02:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > What I really want to be able to do is: > > procedure Inc(X: in out Root_Modular'Class); > > which is of course impossible to write in Ada. What for? I vote with both hands for: procedure Inc(X: in out Modular'Class); but to have a common ancestor for all modular types. what for? And what to do with: type Digital_Outs is new Unsigned_16; It is bad enough that type cloning was lost for tagged types. -- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de