From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1563af5c167aacf2,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-19 11:52:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pd9eb2e6e.dip.t-dialin.NET!not-for-mail From: Immanuel Scholz Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: thick? thin? binding Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:53:47 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9eb2e6e.dip.t-dialin.net (217.235.46.110) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1024512733 9653027 217.235.46.110 (16 [100557]) User-Agent: KNode/0.6.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26419 Date: 2002-06-19T20:53:47+02:00 List-Id: Hi, I read through 1 and a half Ada book and still doesnt catch what "thick" or "thin" binding mean... I know "flat" binding from C or "name mangling" from C++. It this related to this? Immanuel Scholz