From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.157.59.247 with SMTP id k110mr9140920otc.29.1460212506500;
        Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.95.10 with SMTP id dg10mr156528obb.15.1460212506473;
 Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!nt3no9578344igb.0!news-out.google.com!u9ni960igk.0!nntp.google.com!gy3no1262436igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <nea7nu$ikc$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.6.21.101;
 posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.21.101
References: <ne96g7$n0i$1@dont-email.me> <87mvp3ol3t.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <cee0b70e-f122-4a88-b321-8575130d62a7@googlegroups.com>
 <nea7nu$ikc$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <aefbeac4-fa6d-4ab3-9a2d-75b82ba86ed8@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Software on SpaceX / Blue Origin projects
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:35:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30058
Date: 2016-04-09T07:35:06-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 11:36:54 PM UTC-7, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> On 09/04/16 05:10, Anh Vo wrote:
> > On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 2:18:32 PM UTC-7, Paul Rubin wrote:
> >> "Alejandro R. Mosteo" <alejandro@mosteo.com> writes:
> >>> Any idea if there's any Ada in there, or what they use in general?
> >>
> >> They use C++ :(
> >
> > It is only 25% successful rate (one out of four) is not very successful.
> 
> Normal engineering cannot pretend to design everything correctly
> right from the beginning. So, expect some debugging runs. ;-)

Design it landed horizontally, using rocket of course, may increase success rate since it is not vulnerable to winds and waves.