From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,e615e5c9d121e052 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.224.190.193 with SMTP id dj1mr54193623qab.6.1358197758850; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:09:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.39.99 with SMTP id o3mr15490212qek.14.1358197758761; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:09:18 -0800 (PST) Path: k2ni11qap.0!nntp.google.com!p13no26879qai.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:09:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=132.3.37.68; posting-account=b0GbAwoAAABU2b-bFrG729pG1wqiQ19f NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.3.37.68 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: From 16 bit to 32 From: Scott Loyd Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:09:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2013-01-14T13:09:18-08:00 List-Id: I think the representation clauses were originally used as a debugging aid so they knew where all the right bits were instead of worrying about how pragma pack would arrange things, and I think the addresses were grouped in as a matter of completeness. I don't see any reason to keep them around from where I am standing either so I may just remove them all as you suggested.